What should be next? Macro or Teleconverter?

My next acquisition, thanks to my wife, will probably one of the two items as listed below. Either a macro lens or a teleconverter (for my 70-200mm f/2.8 VRII). Whichever one I choose will be in my possession in April of 2011.

I am still vascillating between either one of them and it's hard to make up my mind over which one I could use more, as I could conceivably use both of them.


AF-S VR Micro-NIKKOR 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED $829.99 (retail @ Lens & Shutter)

The PROS:

1. I could shoot images close up that I have never shot before.

2. I could go up to Holland Park and be able to get in close to those flowers that I've always wanted to shoot close up

3. The 105mm can double as a great portrait lens if I need it.

The CONS:

1. The price.

Nikon AF-S Teleconverter TC-20E III $599.99 (retail @ Broadway Camera)

The PROS:

1. I've always wanted to be able to shoot beyond 300mm range, the TC-20EIII will allow me to get out to 400mm

2. I'll be able to use this as a stop gap lens until I get the 600mm and be able to shoot decent images of eagles and other raptors.

3. This teleconverter will satisfy my desire to go LONG and be able to be flexible in my wildlife shooting.

The CONS:

1. My desire to shoot macro.

As you can see this is driving me freakin' insane.  Well, no one ever said decisions were easy.  ~sigh~